FieldHockeyCorner.com

2013 Ratings as of July 22, 3:44 pm
by Ratings Percentage Index (RPI)

Division 3

South Atlantic

  Great Lakes  NE  NE East  NE West  New England  New York  North Atlantic  Northeast  South South Atlantic   All

RankTeamRecord1ACR2RPI3SOS4
1Montclair State21-2 99.30.6890.644
2Catholic15-6 97.60.6410.653
3TCNJ16-4 98.50.6380.597
4Messiah15-6 97.70.6290.623
5Elizabethtown14-6 97.00.5930.561
6Rowan11-7 97.00.5920.601
7Drew16-4 97.10.5810.501
8Alvernia14-7 96.10.5750.555
9Kean14-5 96.60.5670.499
10Scranton14-6 96.40.5640.529
11Richard Stockton12-8 96.20.5530.541
12Arcadia14-7 95.90.5390.495
13Lebanon Valley10-10 95.50.5330.556
14Eastern9-10 95.40.5330.565
15Juniata9-11 95.40.5320.578
16William Paterson10-10 95.50.5230.534
17Delaware Valley13-8 95.30.5190.481
18Susquehanna9-9 95.00.5040.507
19Stevenson11-9 95.20.4980.478
20Gwynedd-Mercy12-9 94.70.4920.464
21Misericordia8-13 94.50.4870.528
22Wilkes8-12 94.40.4790.499
23King's8-8 94.40.4780.461
24FDU6-13 94.30.4770.540
25Albright6-13 93.90.4730.539
26Manhattanville10-8 94.70.4720.425
27Cabrini10-8 94.40.4710.432
28Moravian9-8 94.30.4670.427
29DeSales8-10 93.90.4330.402
30Widener5-13 93.40.4190.454
31Keystone6-11 92.60.3980.395
32Ramapo0-15 92.00.3940.526
33Neumann8-12 92.70.3930.369
34Immaculata6-13 92.50.3920.409
35Marywood4-13 92.10.3680.403
36Goucher4-13 91.90.3580.369
37Hood3-14 90.60.3440.373
38Cedar Crest1-17 89.20.3140.387
1Team Records: Only divisional games are included in the records here.  The same holds true for the three ratings described below.

2Average Computer Rating: An equal weighting of two computer ratings, one based solely on goal differentials (with a 5-goal limit to greatly reduce any effects of "running up the score") and one based solely on wins and losses

3Ratings Percentage Index = 0.25*W/L pct. + 0.50*SOS + 0.25*opponents' SOS

4Strength of Schedule = Avg. of opponents' W/L pct. when not playing that team

Notes
  • Click the column headers to sort the table by that field (in descending order for ratings and alphabetically for teams).


  • In the case of opponent's record in RPI and SOS, games involving the target team have been removed.


  • Calculations are provided only for entertainment purposes.  The ACR has no bearing on tournament selection, while the NCAA's official SOS and RPI are produced and published in October and November.


  • Formulas are constant across schools, allowing comparisons to be valid.


Home